Diagnostic Imaging Solutions Banner

Specializing In Digital Radiography Systems




Med Industry Blog


May 5, 2016

The transition away from x-ray film and Computer Radiography (CR) to Digital Radiography (DR) is advancing rapidly. There are a number of reasons DR is quickly becoming the x-ray digital output of choice.

The most compelling factor, as always, is prices are falling. Today a DR subsystem can be purchased for less than a high performance CR system. This is a direct result of the reduction in cost of DR flat panel detectors, the primary component of the DR system. Therefore, when you have a choice of having the fastest image access, the highest quality images, the lowest exposure dose and favorable pricing the choice is easy, DR wins hands down.

The major producers are not only lowering flat panel detector prices but they are re-engineering the detectors to accommodate different applications, performance and price levels. Your application may dictate the style of detector. You may choose a fixed panel (which is permanently interfaced to a x-ray bucky) and the least expensive. You may choose a tethered detector (which can be moved between different bucky's - like a table bucky and chest stand bucky) and more expensive than the fixed panel. Or you may choose a wireless detector which can be extremely versatile and be moved from device to device or used with multiple systems, i.e. a fixed x-ray system, a portable x-ray system and/or a rad/fluoro system. You now may even purchase systems with a dynamic detectors to capture fluoroscopy applications on R/F systems, c-arms and cath labs.

The most challenging issue associated with DR was the method used to interface it with the x-ray device. The most common method was to cable a detector interface device between the x-ray generator and the flat panel detector or it's holder. This would allow the x-ray generator to signal the detector that is getting ready to make an exposure and that the detector should be activated to accept the exposure. Often a second device was also connected to the DR interface device so the detector could be interfaced to the DR console PC workstation. These interface devices would need to be integrated into the x-ray system, thereby changing the original system design and requiring the x-ray system to again be cleared with the FDA to accommodate the revised design that incorporated the DR interface devices. Getting FDA clearance is generally a difficult task because of the time and expense associated with these approvals.

Detector manufacturers have now developed a design to eliminate interface devices. Automatic Exposure Detectors (AED) are now available with most detectors. AED enables the detector to interface any x-ray source wireless. A detector with AED can be used with any x-ray system without a cable connection to the x-ray system or to the DR console PC workstation. The detector with AED senses the exposure, captures the image data and can send it to the console device. This means a x-ray tech can walk around with a DR detector and a PC (the PC can be a notepad, lap top or any mobile PC) and use this portable, two component DR system, with any or multiple analog x-ray systems (fixed, mobile, RF, etc). Immediately, multiple CR and/or DR systems can be eliminated and replaced with one portable AED DR system. Savings can be enormous.

Today's detectors are available using Amorphous Silicon thin film transistors with a layer of scintillator material. This scintillator converts x-ray to light that can be converted to image data. The scintillator material is available in either gadolinium oxysulfide (Gd202S) or cesium iodide (CsI). The Gd202S based detector is less expensive with similar image quality but requires significant more x-ray exposure (dose) than the CsI detectors. The CsI based detector is effective in minimizing dose but has a significantly higher cost.

All DR systems are not the same, hence the differences in price. One of the most significant differences is in the acquisition/image processing software provided with the DR. Some software is slower, difficult to navigate, have fewer image processing functions and does not fully integrate with the x-ray generator, referred to as Generator Communications (GenCom). The higher performance softwares acquire images in less than five seconds, employ intuitive and comprehensive applications and control the entire system with a GenCom interface.

The manufacturers are now providing cost effective solutions to implementing DR by eliminating costly interfacing, providing a single DR system that can be used with multiple x-ray systems and allowing a choice between lower costing systems which require higher x-ray dose or more expensive DR systems that use less x-ray dose. These innovations are enabling facilities to move into the most effective digital diagnostic imaging solutions available at affordable prices. However, when comparing prices, it is important to understand what you are getting. For example a DR system with a detector using Gd202S scintillator, no AED and no high performance software with GenCom will be priced much less expensive than a DR system with CsI / AED detector and high performance software/GenCom.

Contact us for additional information.

Med Imaging System Sales       www.missales.com

NCD Medical Company             www.ncdmedical.com

Med Industry Blog

Recent Postings

Nov 8, 2016
"Affordable" Care Act - Isn't. How will it effect the Healthcare Industry

The Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare) was passed in March of 2010 contrary to the wishes of the general population. The majority of people were not in favor of this program but the Democratic Congress and President Obama found away to get it passed.

Read Full Article

May 5, 2016

The transition away from x-ray film and Computer Radiography (CR) to Digital Radiography (DR) is advancing rapidly. There are a number of reasons DR is quickly becoming the x-ray digital output of choice.

Read Full Article

March 31, 2014
How To Plan For Diagnostic Imaging Expansion With Healthcare Programs Being Uncertain

Medical facilities are struggling to determine how to accommodate the uncertainty surrounding our current healthcare dilemma. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) was established to increase the number of people who would be insured to receive healthcare benefits, by as many as 30 million people, thereby increasing demand for diagnostic imaging services.

Read Full Article

October 9, 2013
Which C-Arm Should I Buy?

Today you can be faced with many choices when deciding to purchase a mobile c-arm. Although most are appropriate for the majority of procedures, some may be particular good for the procedures you perform. Of course, the first consideration must be financial.

Read Full Article

February 8, 2013
DR Digital X-Ray Prices Finally Low Enough To Compete With CR

Direct Digital Radiography (DR) traditionally have been priced so high that only large medical facilities could afford to install them. The alternative for digital x-ray output has been Computer Radiography (CR).

Read Full Article

Nov. 23, 2012
Demand For Diagnostic Imaging Systems Growing Rapidly In Africa, The Middle East And Eastern Europe - Will The Systems Be Purchased?

The demand for medical facilities and related diagnostic imaging systems is growing at a tremendous rate. There is a strong need for x-ray and fluoroscopic systems as well as CT, MRI and ultrasound systems.

Read Full Article

Aug. 8, 2012

I recently received an email from a physician in India. He had been residing in the United Kingdom for several years and had returned to his home land. He contacted me because he was interested in developing a new business of selling and supporting pre-owned diagnostic imaging systems to facilities throughout India.

Read Full Article

How To Safely Buy Pre-Owned Medical Systems
August 8, 2011

Very often there is a need to acquire additional capability in our health care facilities but there isn't always the funds to purchase a new, full-functioned, state of the art, diagnostic imaging system. Therefore, a decision must be made to determine if the additional services can be shifted to another facility or if it is critical or at least necessary to remain at your facility. The decision usually comes back that it needs to remain and options to accommodate it must be considered.

Read Full Article
As Featured On EzineArticles
July 17, 2011
Digital Radiography - Electronic X-Ray - When, Why and How?

It seems like we have crossed the healthcare frontier and the only thing left to conquer is analog or film based x-ray systems. MRI's, CT's, Ultrasound, PET, Bone Densitometry, Mammography and most diagnostic imaging systems output digital data, that is except for Radiography and Fluoroscopy. Most existing systems are still analog and put out either x-ray film and/or analog video. Although most mobile C-arms are now being produced with digital output capability, most existing C-arms, X-ray systems and R/F systems have not yet been upgraded. When you consider that today there are more x-ray studies done than any other modality study, we should concede, we are way overdue in moving to electronic Rad and Fluoro. These upgrades should probably be initiated before all others at medical facilities today.

Read Full Article
How To Get The Most From Your Radiology Dollar
June 3, 2011

The decisions are getting harder when we try and determine what our facility should invest in to provide the best patient care. 256 slice CTs, 3.0T MRIs, Digital Mammography, PACS Upgrade, EHR and so on....? We first try and determine our available budget or we are asked to submit a request for funds based upon current and future requirements, local competition and/or physician requirements. It is now necessary to take a long hard look at what is currently being utilized and determine how best to enhance capabilities. You probably begin to bring in vendors to discuss the capabilities of their new systems, as well as potential costs. If you are like many administrators, you immediately get a large blast of reality $$$$$$$. You instantly know that you will be limited to one purchase or less and it's possible funding won't be available for several years. If you are experiencing growth, patient count is increasing, test procedures are on the increase, and avaliable system time is becoming harder and harder to come by, then you know you will need to upgrade Radiology capacity.

Read Full Article